Fishnhunt New Zealands main hunting and Fishing Forum. millions of posts on fishing and hunting, dogs, 4x4 vehicles, outdoors and much more Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 100 Replies) Anti Gun Police at it on news today! (Read 3990 times)
Oscar
Donor Member
*****
Offline


Let Us Prey

Posts: 10890
Location: North Otago
Joined: Nov 9th, 2006
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #54 - Apr 17th, 2017 at 8:56pm
Print Post  
Funny how you move from stock to pet  Smiley No gun laws are going to deal with that issue.
  

Herbs before herbivores

Not all those who wander are lost
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Varmint
Forum Font
*****
Online


I Love The FishNhunt Forum

Posts: 1108
Location: Auckland
Joined: May 17th, 2009
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #55 - Apr 17th, 2017 at 9:00pm
Print Post  
Oscar wrote on Apr 17th, 2017 at 8:56pm:
Funny how you move from stock to pet  Smiley No gun laws are going to deal with that issue.


Stock or pet. What's the difference if it's just trespass as you claim?


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
hawken 50
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love The FishNhunt Forum

Posts: 218
Location: hutt valley
Joined: Apr 28th, 2011
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #56 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 7:49am
Print Post  
I was under the impression it was called Armed Trespassing which raises the bar again over just a trespass. Could be wrong though.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Oscar
Donor Member
*****
Offline


Let Us Prey

Posts: 10890
Location: North Otago
Joined: Nov 9th, 2006
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #57 - Apr 18th, 2017 at 8:04am
Print Post  
None of the proposed law changes are in response to poaching, it wont matter the type of firearm used.

The key issue is - firearms homicides have fallen, and fallen faster here than in places with supposed 'tougher' firearms laws. Is there any evidence other firearms offenses aren't correlated?

Too much of the debate, especially the discussion in the media, starts from the assumption we have high and/or rising gun crime. The evidence doesn't support that and the false premise should be challenged first.
  

Herbs before herbivores

Not all those who wander are lost
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
meathunter72
Donor Member
*****
Online



Posts: 2348
Location: Chur Bay
Joined: Nov 7th, 2007
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #58 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 7:04am
Print Post  
Mr Cahill was national radio this morning for the rural news section. The man is either an idiot or a liar.
He referred to the ease of which mssas can be converted to full auto. "its very easy to turn these weapons into full automatics" . I didnt think it was that easy at all? Certainly not an AR15 anyway.  Roll Eyes, how they were high powered rifles."the more high powered weapon"  223s and 7.62 russian are far less powerful rounds than your standard deer calibres like a 270 or 308.   Roll Eyes He also questioned the need for semi autos for hunting.  Angry
He said they want to go after MSSAs first then look at the other semi autos.
Wanker.
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/ruralnews/audio/201840897/morning-r...
« Last Edit: Apr 20th, 2017 at 2:18pm by meathunter72 »  

Poke your nose into the wind and follow it.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
hawken 50
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love The FishNhunt Forum

Posts: 218
Location: hutt valley
Joined: Apr 28th, 2011
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #59 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 7:49am
Print Post  
Mr Cahill can't help himself, It's turning into his own personal vendetta. These are the Police Submissions courtesy of kiwigunblog. https://kiwigunblog.wordpress.com/2017/04/19/the-last-of-the-police-reports/

Some serious reading in there but worth it.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Richard Prosser
Active Member
**
Offline


I Love The FishNhunt Forum

Posts: 99
Location: Rangiora
Joined: Aug 26th, 2013
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #60 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 12:59pm
Print Post  
Hot off the press:


Richard Prosser MP NZ
Spokesperson for Outdoor Recreation
20 APRIL 2017      

POLICE SECRETARY OUT OF LINE OVER HUNTING RIFLE COMMENTS

Police Association president Chris Cahill should stick to police union-related matters, and not interfere in the choice of legal firearms law-abiding licence holders use in the safe enjoyment of their sport, says New Zealand First Outdoor Recreation Spokesperson Richard Prosser

“Mr Cahill was on Radio NZ this morning repeating his questioning of the ‘need’ for-semi automatic hunting rifles and shotguns by hunters and duck shooters.

“He claims firearms which resemble military weapons and other semi-automatics pose a danger to the public.

The fact is police were unable to provide the recent Law and Order Select Committee inquiry into illegal possession of firearms with any figures to back up this claim – and that’s because they don’t pose any such danger.

“Sawn-off shotguns and cut-down .22s are the weapons of choice for criminals, not MSSAs that don’t even appear in the crime stats.

“Mr Cahill’s desire to further restrict and penalise law-abiding hunters and shooters will have no effect whatsoever on the criminals who are the problem.

“Frankly it’s none of his business what type of legal firearm people choose to use; he needs to focus on catching criminals and keep his nose out of law-abiding people’s business,” says Mr Prosser.

ENDS


Contact: Richard Prosser 0212431199

Authorised by Richard Prosser, Parliament Buildings, Wellington

You are subscribed to the New Zealand First media list. To unsubscribe please email NewZealandFirstNews@parliament.govt.nz
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
HiTop
Forum Font
*****
Online


Tops by dawn, a day in
heaven

Posts: 3141
Location: Canterbury
Joined: Apr 15th, 2007
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #61 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 10:19pm
Print Post  
Playing the man Richard.  Demonstrate to the people he represents that he is incorrect and misguided and that will destroy the pedestal on which he stands.  He clearly should not hold the position he has but its up to the Police rank and file to deal with that.  Detail the facts that destroy his statements, job done.

Did you notice the media do not want to present this to the world..... lies make better news Sad
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
GDMP
Forum Senior
****
Offline


I Love The FishNhunt Forum

Posts: 677
Joined: Feb 13th, 2007
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #62 - Apr 20th, 2017 at 11:01pm
Print Post  
Shooters won't get much help from the media.....many of whom will no doubt be sympathetic to his views.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
davflaws
Donor Member
*****
Offline


NOT Training for SAS Selection

Posts: 2905
Location: Whangarei
Joined: Nov 10th, 2006
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #63 - Apr 21st, 2017 at 8:21am
Print Post  
[quote author=77736071756E73010 link=1491589721/47#47 date=1492337978]


'So a couple of questions for you dave, are you a firearms owner? and which camp are you in? the law abiding LICENSED firearms owners can have what they want. or the you can have what we say you can have and only do what you we tell you with them?'
I think this is a false distinction. The issue is about who decides who gets a FAL for what and under what conditions.

I don't know why it is relevant  -  but I owned a P14 for fifteen years, then a Norinco .22 for ten, but when I moved to rental accommodation and storage regs were tightened and the new FAL regs were introduced, it all got too hard and I sold the Norincoand didn't renew my FAL. I now have an airifle for rabbits and possums that stray onto our place. I was (briefly) a member of the pistol club that used the range in the basement of the old Army barracks in Buckle St Wellington, before I realised that at least some of the members were "gun crazy".

I am solidly in the camp that believes the state has a right to limit and control the possession and use of firearms. The important questions (for me) are why and how.

Why is simple  - to keep them out of the hands of people who might do  bad things with them. (I would include shooting at burglars)

The how is more difficult.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
davflaws
Donor Member
*****
Offline


NOT Training for SAS Selection

Posts: 2905
Location: Whangarei
Joined: Nov 10th, 2006
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #64 - Apr 21st, 2017 at 8:23am
Print Post  
[quote author=77736071756E73010 link=1491589721/47#47 date=1492337978]


'So a couple of questions for you dave, are you a firearms owner? and which camp are you in? the law abiding LICENSED firearms owners can have what they want. or the you can have what we say you can have and only do what you we tell you with them?'

I think this is a false distinction. The issue is about who decides who gets a FAL for what and under what conditions.

I don't know why it is relevant  -  but I owned a P14 for fifteen years, then a Norinco .22 for ten, but when I moved to rental accommodation and storage regs were tightened and the new FAL regs were introduced, it all got too hard and I sold the Norincoand didn't renew my FAL. I now have an airifle for rabbits and possums that stray onto our place. I was (briefly) a member of the pistol club that used the range in the basement of the old Army barracks in Buckle St Wellington, before I realised that at least some of the members were "gun crazy".

I am solidly in the camp that believes the state has a right to limit and control the possession and use of firearms. The important questions (for me) are why and how.

Why is simple  - to keep them out of the hands of people who might do  bad things with them. (I would include shooting at burglars)

The how is more difficult.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Oscar
Donor Member
*****
Offline


Let Us Prey

Posts: 10890
Location: North Otago
Joined: Nov 9th, 2006
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #65 - Apr 21st, 2017 at 11:20am
Print Post  
davflaws wrote on Apr 21st, 2017 at 8:23am:
I am solidly in the camp that believes the state has a right to limit and control the possession and use of firearms. The important questions (for me) are why and how.

Why is simple  - to keep them out of the hands of people who might do  bad things with them. (I would include shooting at burglars)

The how is more difficult.


The other 'why' must be to ensure people who wont do bad things with them [i]can[/i] get their hands on them.

In terms of the 'how', the evidence suggests the current system is doing that. Is there good evidence to the contrary?
  

Herbs before herbivores

Not all those who wander are lost
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Oscar
Donor Member
*****
Offline


Let Us Prey

Posts: 10890
Location: North Otago
Joined: Nov 9th, 2006
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #66 - Apr 21st, 2017 at 5:23pm
Print Post  
Fed Farmers are opposed to the proposals too: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11842521

Quote:
Federated Farmers national board member Katie Milne said the lobby group strongly opposed the recommendation that semiautomatic firearms be further regulated, and that permits be required to lend firearms to other gun licence holders.
  

Herbs before herbivores

Not all those who wander are lost
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Richard Prosser
Active Member
**
Offline


I Love The FishNhunt Forum

Posts: 99
Location: Rangiora
Joined: Aug 26th, 2013
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #67 - Apr 21st, 2017 at 7:19pm
Print Post  
You're right HiTop, and I very much prefer to play the ball; believe it or not I generally avoid playing the man if at all possible. I do find it rather distasteful. But this chap has made it about him and his personal preferences, and unless and until he makes it clear that he is speaking for and on behalf of his union and its members, and I doubt that such is the case and I certainly hope not, then personal it will remain.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Micky Duck
Donor Member
*****
Online


You shot it..You pluck
it

Posts: 6067
Location: Geraldine South Canterbury
Joined: Dec 5th, 2013
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #68 - Apr 21st, 2017 at 9:34pm
Print Post  
Richard Prosser wrote on Apr 21st, 2017 at 7:19pm:
You're right HiTop, and I very much prefer to play the ball; believe it or not I generally avoid playing the man if at all possible. I do find it rather distasteful. But this chap has made it about him and his personal preferences, and unless and until he makes it clear that he is speaking for and on behalf of his union and its members, and I doubt that such is the case and I certainly hope not, then personal it will remain.


quote
Radar, I am going to be blunt. The law does not need tightening. It simply needs enforcing.

You don't take it kindly? You're not supposed to. You're supposed to take it as an advisory. The law-abiding licenced firearms using community have had a gutsful of being made the scapegoat because of Government and Police incompetence.

If you have a gripe about your ability to do your job properly, then tell your Commissioner to tell the Minister to tell the Cabinet that you need more resources, more money, and more boots on the ground. You already have our support for that.

But don't go repeating the same provably erroneous bullshit that your new Association President appears to have become fond of disseminating.

In the Select Committee we asked for documentary proof supporting claims about the number of firearms that were stolen from FAL holders, the number that ended up in criminal hands, even the number of times that Officers were faced with firearms in the course of their duties. There are no such figures, because Police do not collect or keep them, and the claims that were made, by the Police, and by the Police Association, to Parliament's Select Committee, were on that count pure fiction.

People are not stupid. They know when they're being lied to.

Look at your own burglary investigation rate, look at your burglary clearance rate, look at the gaping holes in both records and procedure where Police oversight of firearms ownership is concerned.

And don't be so bloody arrogant. unquote


hmmmmm Roll Eyes the above statement you made earlier would tend to show otherwise.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
HiTop
Forum Font
*****
Online


Tops by dawn, a day in
heaven

Posts: 3141
Location: Canterbury
Joined: Apr 15th, 2007
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #69 - Apr 21st, 2017 at 9:42pm
Print Post  
Richard Prosser wrote on Apr 21st, 2017 at 7:19pm:
You're right HiTop, and I very much prefer to play the ball; believe it or not I generally avoid playing the man if at all possible. I do find it rather distasteful. But this chap has made it about him and his personal preferences, and unless and until he makes it clear that he is speaking for and on behalf of his union and its members, and I doubt that such is the case and I certainly hope not, then personal it will remain.

I understand your approach but honestly, kicking the chair out from under him, in other words getting Police officers to question his suitability for the role, will achieve both objectives without appearing to call him out personally.  Leave that to the Police themselves and if they don't act then I think that indicates a problem far more deeply seated than what is being seen here Sad  I applaud your interest though Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Richard Prosser
Active Member
**
Offline


I Love The FishNhunt Forum

Posts: 99
Location: Rangiora
Joined: Aug 26th, 2013
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #70 - Apr 21st, 2017 at 9:52pm
Print Post  
Micky Duck wrote on Apr 21st, 2017 at 9:34pm:
Richard Prosser wrote on Apr 21st, 2017 at 7:19pm:
You're right HiTop, and I very much prefer to play the ball; believe it or not I generally avoid playing the man if at all possible. I do find it rather distasteful. But this chap has made it about him and his personal preferences, and unless and until he makes it clear that he is speaking for and on behalf of his union and its members, and I doubt that such is the case and I certainly hope not, then personal it will remain.


quote
Radar, I am going to be blunt. The law does not need tightening. It simply needs enforcing.

You don't take it kindly? You're not supposed to. You're supposed to take it as an advisory. The law-abiding licenced firearms using community have had a gutsful of being made the scapegoat because of Government and Police incompetence.

If you have a gripe about your ability to do your job properly, then tell your Commissioner to tell the Minister to tell the Cabinet that you need more resources, more money, and more boots on the ground. You already have our support for that.

But don't go repeating the same provably erroneous bullshit that your new Association President appears to have become fond of disseminating.

In the Select Committee we asked for documentary proof supporting claims about the number of firearms that were stolen from FAL holders, the number that ended up in criminal hands, even the number of times that Officers were faced with firearms in the course of their duties. There are no such figures, because Police do not collect or keep them, and the claims that were made, by the Police, and by the Police Association, to Parliament's Select Committee, were on that count pure fiction.

People are not stupid. They know when they're being lied to.

Look at your own burglary investigation rate, look at your burglary clearance rate, look at the gaping holes in both records and procedure where Police oversight of firearms ownership is concerned.

And don't be so bloody arrogant. unquote


hmmmmm Roll Eyes the above statement you made earlier would tend to show otherwise.



Oh, for God's sake, Micky Duck, don't be so precious. I don't know who you are and I don't know who Radar is. But when I see someone who identifies themselves by saying words to the effect of "I'm a Police Officer and I don't take kindly...." etc, then my 'Up Yours' gland gets tickled.

It's in the same vein as Aaron Gilmore saying "Don't you know who I am", and we all know what happened to him.

Police are a civilian organisation in New Zealand, and Police don't make the rules. We all have to sit down to shit. No-one is better than everyone else, and no-one has the right to insinuate that they have some greater degree of clout or expectation of respect because of the job they do. That applies to Police as much as it does to politicians like me.

That's what that was about. Make it personal, and that's how I will respond.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
hawken 50
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love The FishNhunt Forum

Posts: 218
Location: hutt valley
Joined: Apr 28th, 2011
Gender: Male
Re: Anti Gun Police at it on news today!
Reply #71 - Apr 22nd, 2017 at 7:44am
Print Post  
People I do believe we're all on the same page here (no pun intended). We are all Licensed Firearms Owners/Users so we should all be directing our attention to the biggest threat to our sports/pastimes in recent history. Namely Mr Chris Cahill. He set the trend with his rhetoric (read Lies) in the mainstream media so as far as we're concerned he is our No1 focal point. We have to really discredit him as he is not going to go away. Challenge everything he say's in the same medium he uses. If he lies then use the official complaints mechanism and just keep at him/mainstream media. We have to stick/work together on this regardless of your shooting discipline. I wish us all LUCK.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 
Send TopicPrint
 

FishnHunt - New Zealands Famous Hunting and Fishing Forum Since 1995 » Powered by YaBB 2.6.11!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2017. All Rights Reserved.
Site Design By Alan Simmons - PRism and all rights are reserved from 1995 and onwards